Chinese officials admit 'no evidence' Covid originated in raccoon dogs
Chinese officials admit there is ‘no evidence’ Covid originated in raccoon dogs — despite report from Fauci-linked scientists
- Former Chinese CDC head said it’s still a mystery which animal was the reservoir
- His statements contradict a recent report pointing to raccoon dogs as a source
- Scientists found genetic material from animals and Covid in Wuhan market stalls
Chinese officials are disputing a report tying the origins of the Covid pandemic to raccoon dogs.
The contested findings were first reported in March by scientists who suggested that raccoon dogs – fluffy fox-like mammals – sold in a Wuhan market were carrying the coronavirus at the end of 2019.
Some of the researchers behind the report including Dr Kristian Andersen and Dr Robert Garry are confidants of Dr Anthony Fauci, who oversaw America’s research into pathogenic disease when the pandemic erupted.
The report steered some validity away from the hypothesis that Covid escaped from a biolab in Wuhan, a theory that Chinese officials have soundly rejected. But, many experts have cast their doubts on the findings, saying all they do is prove that raccoon dogs were present at the market.
Now, a former Chinese government official is arguing that there is no evidence showing which animal, including raccoon dogs, may have first harbored the pandemic-causing coronavirus before it infected humans.
Dr George Gao, former head of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention said on Friday that There is no evidence yet showing which animal the COVID-causing virus may have come from
The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate about how to prevent the next pandemic. New studies point to a natural spillover at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbor Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bottom right)
Dr Gao said at the Rhodes Policy Summit in London on Friday: ‘Even now, people think some animals are the host or reservoir. Cut a long story short, there is no evidence which animals (were) where the virus comes (from).’
The Chinese government has been criticized for repeatedly thwarting efforts by international scientists to pinpoint the cause of the global pandemic which has killed at least 6.8 million people.
In the March report, animals were present just before the samples were collected — making them a potential vessel to transmit the virus to humans.
The March study authors said that their findings of Covid genetic evidence near wildlife stalls at the market supported their theory that wildlife harbored the virus before it eventually mutated in such a way to make it infectious in humans.
Experts pour scorn on data suggesting raccoon dogs responsible for COVID
Lab leak skeptics seize upon study weeks after US said virus did come from Wuhan research facility.
Scientists did not make the raw data available with their pre-print report, making it impossible for independent experts to fact-check their findings.
The study began when Dr Florence Débarre, from the French National Center for Scientific Research, came across genetic sequences uploaded to a database by Chinese scientists.
Researchers downloaded the data, hoping to investigate it as part of their search for Covid’s origin.
However, it was pulled down by the Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the agency directed by Dr Gao.
Researchers learned later that the data was uploaded on June 22, 2022, but not released to the public.
It was also used for a pre-print report revealed by Chinese scientists in February 2022
It was removed from the database on March 11. This research team had already downloaded it.
GISAID, which is based in Munich, Germany, accused the team of breaching the database’s terms of use by acquiring the data, they say in the report.
While the highly anticipated report was headline-grabbing, experts have argued that detecting a genetic trail left behind by animals in the same place that samples of the virus were detecting is no smoking gun.
Scientists have said the findings fall short of providing definitive proof that Covid traveled from animals to humans in a spillover event.
The study took swab samples from carts in the market which were found to contain more than 4,500 fragments of genetic material from raccoon dogs in addition to genetic signatures of the coronavirus.
Their data also uncovered positive Covid specimens from mammals such as the Malayan porcupine, amur hedgehog, masked palm civet and hoary bamboo rat.
But, the raccoon dogs made up more than 80 percent of DNA and RNA detected.
Researchers identified stalls in the southwest corner of the market where Covid is most prevalent. A large portion of Covid samples gathered from the area were from raccoon dogs, they determined
The authors of the study said: ‘Once the initial spillovers had taken place, the market likely became a place of widespread human-to-human transmission.’
Raccoon dogs act as intermediate hosts of the virus — meaning they catch pathogens from the wild and harbor it without falling ill themselves.
There is a risk they can spread viruses to humans — or any other animal they come into contact with.
The research team claims that Covid and the raccoon dog specimens being detected in the same place is too eerie to be a coincidence.
Proponents of the theory that Covid escaped from a high-security biolab in Wuhan that studies coronaviruses, one that used to be painted as a xenophobic conspiracy, were skeptical of the findings.
At the time, Dr Richard Ebright, a microbiologist at Rutgers University in New Jersey, told DailyMail.com that the new research added ‘little to the discussion’ about Covid’s origin and necessitated ‘extreme caution’.
Last month, FBI Director Christpher Wray confirmed that the bureau believed with ‘moderate confidence’ in the lab leak theory. Other intelligence agencies are less certain.
Four agencies and the National Intelligence Council concluded with ‘low confidence’ that Covid emerged from a natural spillover event.
Dr Kristian Andersen, a Danish biologist from the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California, was among the authors of the March report.
He rose to prominence in 2021 when emails between him and Dr Anthony Fauci discussing how the virus may have been engineered early in the pandemic were revealed to the public.
Dr Andersen also was the lead author of a February 2020 paper some have said was designed to squash the theory that Covid may have escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). That paper, now infamous, was titled ‘Proximal Origin’.
Dr Garry, a microbiologist at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana, is an author too.
Dr Garry was also involved in discussions early in the pandemic about the potential synthetic nature of the virus, and on a call with Dr Andersen and Dr Fauci where it is alleged they discussed how to dismiss the lab leak.
Dr Garry told DailyMail.com last month: ‘There is absolutely no lab leak scenario that is consistent with this data.
‘It’s time to nail the coffin containing all the lab leak conspiracy theories shut and give this long dead corpse a proper burial.’
DailyMail.com reached out to Dr Andersen for comment as well.
Source: Read Full Article